Archive for September, 2012

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Volume 4 Issue 38 – The Flying Player – Quote of the Week

September 24, 2012

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog
Sharpening Referee Knowledge and Judgment, One Week at a Time
Volume 4, Issue 38, September 23, 2012

Forward this to a Friend!
Please forward this Blog to your fellow soccer officials.

The purpose of this Blog is so we can all learn from each other’s experience and by doing so, avoid mistakes, make more consistent calls, and do a better job. I don’t have to make any of this up – this is what happens on the pitch.

Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Now Online

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog is now online!

You can see it at this link, and once there if you want, you can click on the “Follow” link at the top.

This will give you a notice when the Blog is updated – in effect, you’ll get it HOURS before the mailing list goes out, since I set the blog to release at 12:00.

Quote of the Week:

“But they didn’t ask for 10!”

From a Premiere level player, after being cautioned for walking directly into the path of a Direct Free Kick, effectively delaying the restart.

Soccer and Gerry Davis Sports – The Poor Stepchild

I read with great interest the big sale offer from Gerry Davis Sports.  They had special deals for football, basketball, track and field, swimming and diving, and volleyball officials.

What did they have for soccer?  Nothing.  Nada. Zip.

They did offer this on their website (only): A Pink jersey.  No yellow.  No Red.  No Blue.  No Black.  No Green.  Just P-I-N-K.  Who do they think we are?  Victoria’s Secret models?

Honestly, does ANYONE own one of these? (Not the old USSF ones, the new one from Gerry Davis.)

This Week’s Question – Flying Players

On a U-14 Championship game…

Team A has had a good game, and has driven in several goals.  Attacking player A18 is making a drive up the right side of the field, moving forward at a high rate of speed.

Defender B12 is in hot pursuit.  You see B12 launch himself, feet first, into A18’s path, and as a result, you see A18 go flying through the air and crash to the ground, head first near the touchline and not within the penalty area.

You Make the Call

What is the call?
What is the restart?

Last Week’s Question – Low Header

From a recent VarsityHigh School game…

There is a lot of good play going on in this game.  After the ball is kicked from the mid line towards the team’s goalkeeper, Player B12 sees the ball bouncing back.  With Player A2 in pursuit (heading towards the ball from 15 yards out), B12 leans way over, and uses his head to play the ball back to the goalkeeper for Team B.

As “leans way over” was described, think of the player almost parallel to the ground.

You Make the Call:

What is the call?
What is the restart?

What You Said:

Referee 1:
In the opinion… If you feel the player is endangering himself by lowering his head, IFK for dangerous play. If not, play continues.

The Answer:
From USSF, Law 12, Fouls and Misconduct, Indirect Free Kick:

An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a goalkeeper, inside his own penalty area, commits any of the following four offenses:

  • Touched the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate.

This is clarified by memo, and by USSF’s “Advice to Referees” which has the following guidance:

“Engages in trickery to circumvent the goalkeeper’s limitation on handling the ball played from a teammate’s foot (the defender who initiates the “trickery” is cautioned, the decision does not require that the goalkeeper actually handles the ball, and the misconduct can occur during dynamic play or at a restart)”

Trickery in this case, as has been provided by USSF in various examples (e.g., Fouls and Misconduct), would be using the feet to play the ball to the head, and then pass it to the goalkeeper.

How about NFHS?
Rule 12, Fouls and Misconduct, Section 7, Restrictions on the Goalkeeper

Article 3 On any occasion when a player deliberately kicks the ball to his/her own goalkeeper, the goalkeeper is not permitted to touch it with his/her hands.

This is further amplified by the Note after 4, which states:

Note: Players may not use trickery to circumvent Articles 3 and 4.  Example: Players may not flick the ball with their feet to their own head, chest, knee and then pass it to their own goalkeeper who then touches it with the hands.

PENALTY: Indirect free kick awarded to the opponent at the spot of the violation, unless in the goal area.

So, what do we have?  Looking at the situation, the player did not engage in trickery, either as defined by USSF or NFHS.  He leaned over to play the ball with his head.  He didn’t play the ball with his feet (or chest or knee) to get it to his head.

So, the right call in this case is no call…at least until someone adds this into the “trickery” definition, which is pretty clear cut at this point.

Both referees in the 2 person system saw this, and made the correct “non-call.”  It is shared because it is unusual.  Like I have said, I usually don’t have to make stuff up.

This is a free service.  No advertising is solicited; no “donations” are requested.

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Volume 4 Issue 37 – Low Header – Quote of the Week – Return to Brickpasser

September 17, 2012

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog
Sharpening Referee Knowledge and Judgment, One Week at a Time
Volume 4, Issue 37, September 16, 2012

Forward this to a Friend!
Please forward this Blog to your fellow soccer officials.

The purpose of this Blog is so we can all learn from each other’s experience and by doing so, avoid mistakes, make more consistent calls, and do a better job. I don’t have to make any of this up – this is what happens on the pitch.

A Day Late

I’m sorry this is going out a day late – I worked the Great Lakes Soccer Classic on Saturday and Sunday for referee, assignor and all-around good guy Ron Colaizzi, and ended up working 10 games in two days, covering around 23 miles on U12, U13 and U14 games.

After that, I made a deal with my wife to go see the kids down at the U of I, so by the time I drove back, it was way late, and I was too tired to do much of anything other than sleep.

I’m putting this out before I head back to Omaha.  Sorry for the delay.

Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Now Online

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog is now online!

You can see it at this link, and once there if you want, you can click on the “Follow” link at the top.

This will give you a notice when the Blog is updated – in effect, you’ll get it HOURS before the mailing list goes out, since I set the blog to release at 12:00.

(This is a “Shortlink”)  (Does anybody use these things?  Should I drop this?)

Quote of the Week:

“You suck!”

From the parents of a losing team, after the referee had ejected their goal keeper for violent conduct.

A Return to “Brickpasser”

There were a lot of replies with kind words and compliments on the last issue of the blog.  One contained information that was of a technical nature, that I felt I should share.  This comment comes from a current referee, former police officer, and current attorney.

This is not only a criminal case; it is also a civil case for battery, an intentional tort. It allows for both compensatory and punitive damages. Since it is an intentional tort, any judgment is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. While some may feel it petty, I have encouraged officials who are assaulted to not only file criminal charges but a civil law suit for damages. I have recovered judgments for officials who were assaulted. In my mind, nothing sends a message like having to get your wallet out and pay a judgment against you.

Also, if that word gets out, maybe some of these idiots will think. No, I am not soliciting business from either your or your readers but feel my fellow officials should take every conceivable action to put a stop to this insanity, which seems pervasive at the lower level age games.

Enough said?  You can go with a civil trial, should you choose to.

Feedback from IHSA on Special Reports

One of the questions on a recent IHSA exam centered around special reports.  I challenged the question, since there is nothing that really defines when a Special Report is warranted outside of the usual ejections or uniform violations.

IHSA has provided the following guidance, which should be followed strictly:

“A special report is a tool for officials to use to notify the IHSA as well as school administrators of a situation or issue that occurred before, during or after a game outside of an ejection.

If officials do not submit a special report, then the issue (i.e. improper field markings, no ball runners etc.) will not be addressed and the problem(s) will persist during subsequent games.”

So, if anything is a problem (e.g., no ball handlers, ball handlers too young, inattentive, no restraining stripe for coaches / teams / spectators, etc.,) IHSA expects and demands a special report.

Please make a note of this.  Remember, there is no differentiation about JV or Freshman games in the above clarification, so I would interpret that to mean a Special Report gets filed for just about every JV and Freshman / Sophomore game, since I can recall maybe a handful in the dozens I have done that had such luxuries.

This Week’s Question – Low Header

From a recent VarsityHigh School game…

There is a lot of good play going on in this game.  After the ball is kicked from the mid line towards the team’s goalkeeper, Player B12 sees the ball bouncing back.  With Player A2 in pursuit (heading towards the ball from 15 yards out), B12 leans way over, and uses his head to play the ball back to the goalkeeper for Team B.

As “leans way over” was described, think of the player almost parallel to the ground.

You Make the Call

What is the call?
What is the restart?

Last Week’s Question – The Saunter

During a U-19 Game today…

Play has been fairly even, with both teams having opportunities to score.  Player B10 has been a spark plug for his team, and has had the best challenges to Team A’s goalkeeper to date.

A Direct Free Kick is called for a holding foul.  As A81 steps forward to take the kick, you see B10 change direction and saunter directly in front of the ball, blocking A81’s ability to take the quick kick.

You Make the Call:

What is the call?
What is the restart?

What You Said:

Referee 1:
B10 veered out of his way to delay/impede the re-start.  For a first offense, either a warning or YC is justified.  (I used a warning two days ago, and it cured the problem).

After that, just go with the YC. Restart is unchanged. 

The Answer:

From USSF:

Cautionable Offenses: A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offenses:

– Delaying the restart of play.

From IHSA:

From Rule 13, Fouls and Misconduct – Section 8 – Misconduct

Art. 1: A player, coach or bench personnel shall be cautioned (yellow card) for:

f. Unsporting conduct, including by not limited to:

5. encroachment

From Rule 18, Definitions:

k. ENCROACHMENT – The act, by one or more defenders, of advancing within 10 yards of the ball prior to the taking of the free kick.

So, why should YOU consistently caution this act?

Simple: this act takes away the quick restart.  It denies the offended team the opportunity to take advantage of the situation as allowed by the laws / rules of the game.  It takes away from the pleasure of the spectators, by making the game slower and less enjoyable.

A better reason is that once this is cautioned, it generally stops for the game unless the teams aren’t paying attention.

This is a plague on our sport, folks.  We need to act as a unified front, and put an end to this act which disrespects the sport we officiate.

The Rules / Laws are clear.  If a player makes such a move, they either encroach or delay the restart of play, and looking at the wording, a Caution must be given.  It isn’t optional – if the Rules / Laws said “should,” that would imply an option.  The Laws / Rules are written in a more direct manner.  Follow the intent of the laws please.

And to quote Dave Rubini, you’ll eliminate one of the many acts that “make my head explode!”

This is a free service.  No advertising is solicited by me; no “donations” are requested.

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Volume 4 Issue 36 – The Saunter – Quote of the Week – More on IHSA Test

September 10, 2012

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog
Sharpening Referee Knowledge and Judgment, One Week at a Time
Volume 4, Issue 36, September 9, 2012

Quote of the Week:

“I boobed it in.”

Heard from a player during a U17 girls game, in which a cross from the corner, the ball hits her in the chest, changed direction, and went into the goal.

More on This Year’s IHSA Test

I did hear from the IHSA – One of the questions I challenged is being thrown out, while they did not agree with the other two questions.  I followed up by quoting chapter and verse from the same Rules they chose to quote.

Here are your further thoughts:

Referee 1: I agree with your comments on the test. I also had a problem with one of my incorrect answers. I went back to the book and the answer I selected was exactly what the rule book said. Pretty hard to figure out how or why the answer was incorrect.

Referee 2: I agree the test is written very poorly especially for a group that is working in the education business—I took the test last night (last minute as usual) I did get a 92 but I also got the second caution question wrong and one on what was considered legal equipment–I guess a rubber band is ok

Referee 3: Gee you see it now, 20 years ago when (name redacted) ran the system, it was common for answers to have different answers the next year for the same questions.

I kept all the tests and answer sheets and would send them in registered letter asking how these answers could be incorrect if last year it was correct? Needless to say, (name redacted) and I bumped heads a lot – you know I always strived for that 100, I got computer error – oh well – it is what it is – and so on .

HERE IS WHY THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO GET A 100. BACK THEN, THE ONES WHO WERE INVOLVED THE IN FIXING OF THE ONES WHO DID ALL THE FINALS MANY YOU KNOW, THEY ALL GOT 100s.  STRANGE BUT TRUE. I GUESS WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND HAS COME AROUND AGAIN.

“’They’ are back”

This Week’s Question – The Saunter

During a U-19 Game today…

Play has been fairly even, with both teams having opportunities to score.  Player B10 has been a spark plug for his team, and has had the best challenges to Team A’s goalkeeper to date.

A Direct Free Kick is called for a holding foul.  As A81 steps forward to take the kick, you see B10 change direction and saunter directly in front of the ball, blocking A81’s ability to take the quick kick.

You Make the Call

What is the call?
What is the restart?

Last Week’s Question – Brick-Passer

On a U8 Recreational game…

An adult referee was asked to cover this U8 game, due to conflicts between the team coaches, as well as problems with the Team A coach verbally abusing the youth referees.

The game has been in progress for a while.  The referee, who is acting solo (small field, no offside), has stayed within 6 feet of play during the game, and has called dozens of U8 fouls.

Two players are contesting for the ball, headed towards Team B’s goal.  Player A5 and B12 are shoulder to shoulder, arms at their sides, with the ball within playing distance.

Both players fall over the ball.  Player B12 gets up, while Player A5 stays on the ground.  The referee waits a few seconds to see if A5 is getting up, then whistles the ball dead and calls the coach on to the field.

As the referee is backing up, he clearly hears the Team A Coach tell A5 “That’s okay kid – you got fouled.  Either the Ref didn’t see it, or he didn’t care.”

The referee waits for the Team A Coach (the problem coach) to get A5 off the field.  Once A5 is seated, the referee calmly explains to the Team A Coach that his comments were dissent, and Cautions the coach (as allowed by the Rec Soccer League Rules.)

As the coach moves away, he starts in with another outburst: “If you aren’t going to keep the game safe and call fouls…”

The Referee turns back to the coach, and provides the coach with a second Caution, and then shows the Team A Coach the Red Card, and ejects him.

As the referee is moving back on to the field, the mother of Player A5 runs on to the field from the bench area.  She is yelling “Where is that player’s caution?”  “Why isn’t that player being cautioned?”  Remember: This is U8 Recreational Soccer).

The referee calmly explains that the mother must leave the field, and that no caution is warranted as no actions were observed that were reckless.  The mother persists in arguing for a caution.  The referee again asks the mother to leave the field.

The mother continues to yell at the official.  As the official is deciding to terminate the game, the husband of the mother runs on to the field, and grabs the referee by the throat.

The referee does not fight back.  Within seconds, bystanders on the sidelines pull the husband off the referee.

You Make the Call:

What in the heck do you do with THIS situation?

And yes, it really did happen.

What You Said:

Referee 1:

Definitely game termination is due, due to misconduct of the parents. A report to game authority is required.

As for the assault by the coach, call 911 for the police and make a full report.

Referee 2:

It is sad that a U8 recreational game has to end this way. If it’s me, no doubt the game is over, and I will be filing criminal and civil charges against that so called “father”! You aren’t worthy of that title when you engage in such an example like this for your child. All you are at that point is a sperm donor. I might even consider getting DCFS involved, because this guy should lose his parental privileges.

The mother’s a different story. While I don’t condone her behavior, and it will be included in the match report to the league, there isn’t much else you can do with her.

Don’t forget to pull the coach’s pass and send it in with the match report to the league, with as many factual details you can include without including any opinions.

Referee 3:

Since the referee was physically assaulted the first call MUST be to the police. Identify yourself as a soccer referee and inform the dispatcher that you have been assaulted. If you know the name of the person, give the name as they will most likely attempt to leave the area before the police arrive.

This is not negotiable, and not optional. ANY assault on a referee must be dealt with immediately and severely. Failing to call the police will send the wrong message. Assaulting a referee is a (I believe) class 4 felony.

The next call would be to the head of the rec league to inform them of the ejection and the call to the police.

After that, let the league and the police handle it.

The Answer:

Yes this happened.  It happened to me.

Hindsight is 20/20.  In hindsight, when I asked the mother to leave the field the first time and she didn’t comply, I should have terminated the game – period.  I put the U8 player’s game ahead of common sense.  I can’t say it would have changed the outcome of what happened.  Who can?  I can say this – after I was attacked, I had a bunch of traumatized U8 players standing around crying.  Yep, if it happens again, I’ll just Terminate the game.

The coach who I ejected had been harassing my officials all year.  There was an emotional board meeting, where one of the parents of a player on the coaches’ team was complaining that the other team was parking kids at the goal mouth, “clearly offside”.  I tried to explain that in U8 Rec, offside isn’t enforced by the rules of the league.  “It isn’t fair,” they responded.  “It’s our Laws, and it is legal” I explained.

It didn’t matter – they wanted someone senior to ref the game, so I took it.  I had dealt with this coach more than once as part of a board action – he was holding practices at his home (no insurance) instead of the practice fields, and was causing attrition of young officials.

I called a tight game (pretty easy at U8).  How Tight?  I called EVERYTHING.

So, what do you do now?  You have someone with your hand around your throat.

Fortunately, I didn’t have to wait long for help.  Several bystanders ran on to the field, and pulled the guy off of me.  As I was getting air back, I went to the sidelines and asked the people to “Call 911, I have been assaulted.”  They did.

The police arrived, but our parent had left already.  Not to worry, the police took my statements, got several other statements and a video tape of the event, and arrested him.

It gets weirder.  The night after the assault, I got a call from the association president, who asked me point blank “Did you use any racial words out there?”

The question was appalling.  I work for a large company – to say I have been trained on how to be PC would be an understatement.  I knew exactly what I had said, and nothing racial was involved.  They also had everything on video tape.

So, the President watched the tape, and then called the guy back and asked him if he was sure that was the story he wanted to go with, because “I have just watched the tape, and nothing like that is heard.”  The parent backed off of his statements.

What happened next would have made a great comedy.  I got to talk with the State’s Attorney, who explained he didn’t think the Felony Law applied to Rec Soccer.  I told him I spoke with the official who had worked with his State Rep to get the law put into place after he had been assaulted, and that in their opinions, the law DID cover any sports official.

Then the other shoe dropped – the SA told me the guy had a job where if he got a Felony on his record, he could no longer do his job.

So, he got off with a misdemeanor.  He was banned from ever coming on the soccer complex property again.  He had to write a letter of apology to the association, and to me.

The family moved out of the area, and to Rockford.  I sent a letter to the assignor up there, telling him to watch out.

So, What Do You Do?

First off, if you get a parent on the field, and they don’t comply with your instruction to leave, TERMINATE THE GAME.  Trust me.

Second, if the worst thing happens, and someone grabs you, chest butts you, heads you, kicks you, or anything else, Call 911.  Get the police involved.

Third, and very importantly: DO NOT FIGHT BACK.  The parents on the sideline were all sympathetic because I was the victim – I could have tried to break his grip on my throat, but I considered what I had read in NASO – fighting back makes you part of the problem.

Forth: Go to the wall with this – Talk to your State’s Attorney.  Drive the issue, and push for a conviction.

Fifth: Don’t read the blogs in newspapers.  Some of the stuff people wrote about me was enough to make me want to throw up.  “He’s going to file a civil case.” was the comment I found the most annoying.  It’s a criminal matter, not a civil matter.  It will drive you nuts if you read them.

Sixth: get back on the horse, and get out there and ref again.  Don’t get me wrong, I was a little jumpy for the next few months.  With that said, I’m back at it now, and am still having a great time.  And I’ll still terminate a game without much provocation if I have parents on the field.

No ads or “donations” are solicited or requested.

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog – Volume 4 Issue 35 – Brick Passer – IHSA Test Comments – Quote of the Week

September 3, 2012

The Weekly Soccer Referee Blog
Sharpening Referee Knowledge and Judgment, One Week at a Time
Volume 4, Issue 35, September 2, 2012

Forward this to a Friend!

Please forward this Blog to your fellow soccer officials.

The purpose of this Blog is so we can all learn from each other’s experience and by doing so, avoid mistakes, make more consistent calls, and do a better job. I don’t have to make any of this up – this is what happens on the pitch.

Quote of the Week:

“That’s not a rule!  You made it up!”

Heard from a player in a high level U16 boys tournament, with teams from all over the U.S.

The defender was trying to clear a ball out of trouble, played it diagonally across the box hoping to put it out for a throw in. The goalkeeper chased it down in the Penalty Area and picked it up. An Indirect Free Kick was called for intentional pass back.

2012 IHSA Soccer Exam – Your Opinions

I think I made it pretty clear that I wasn’t pleased with the questions and accepted answers from the IHSA Exam.  I’ve already emailed the IHSA person who is responsible for Soccer, asking for an explanation.  I’ll follow up that email with a phone call this week.

Here is what you said:

“The high school test this year was one of the poorest worded tests I’ve ever seen. But as far as the correct procedure on administering a second caution, I just went with the same procedure as USSF and I’m pretty sure I got that one correct. The one I missed had to do with them implying that the team of a player getting a second caution somehow being allowed to play at full strength, as if the rule wasn’t changed this year. I think it was question 42 on the master list. I didn’t see a correct answer to it so I was forced to guess.”

“I agree that some of the IHSA questions were goofy, and the one you cite (#114) was especially so. “

“I was also disappointed to receive an 88% after studying the rule book cover to cover. The same question that I got right last year was marked incorrect this year. I did not find any changes to that particular rule. My second incorrect answer was to do with selecting the best balls from both teams which I answered according to the rules, but was marked incorrect. The question of markings on the field I found confusing.”

“Glad to see I was not the only one who was tripped over a few of the test questions.

I talked with an official who going for promotion and he too had a problem with the same questions. As for me, I wasn’t happy, but since I was not going for promotion and still passed it, I did not pursue it.”

More Thoughts:

We, and when I saw “WE” in this case, I mean those of us who are patched by the IHSA, can’t let this exam stand.

If we allow this poor exam to stand, we say that we are accepting that for our $45 payment to officiate games, we’re also accepting sub-standard tests that have answers that don’t match up with the NFHS Rules.

Take a stand – contact the IHSA by phone or email, and explain why the questions that you missed were incorrectly scored.  If we all work together, we can make a difference. 

People are not being promoted because of these questions folks – we can’t stand back and let this go.

This Week’s Question – Brick-Passer

On a U8 Recreational game…

An adult referee was asked to cover this U8 game, due to conflicts between the team coaches, as well as problems with the Team A coach verbally abusing the youth referees.

The game has been in progress for a while.  The referee, who is acting solo (small field, no offside), has stayed within 6 feet of play during the game, and has called dozens of U8 fouls.

Two players are contesting for the ball, headed towards Team B’s goal.  Player A5 and B12 are shoulder to shoulder, arms at their sides, with the ball within playing distance.

Both players fall over the ball.  Player B12 gets up, while Player A5 stays on the ground.  The referee waits a few seconds to see if A5 is getting up, then whistles the ball dead and calls the coach on to the field.

As the referee is backing up, he clearly hears the Team A Coach tell A5 “That’s okay kid – you got fouled.  Either the Ref didn’t see it, or he didn’t care.”

The referee waits for the Team A Coach (the problem coach) to get A5 off the field.  Once A5 is seated, the referee calmly explains to the Team A Coach that his comments were dissent, and Cautions the coach (as allowed by the Rec Soccer League Rules.)

As the coach moves away, he starts in with another outburst: “If you aren’t going to keep the game safe and call fouls…”

The Referee turns back to the coach, and provides the coach with a second Caution, and then shows the Team A Coach the Red Card, and ejects him.

As the referee is moving back on to the field, the mother of Player A5 runs on to the field from the bench area.  She is yelling “Where is that player’s caution?”  “Why isn’t that player being cautioned?”  (Remember: This is U8 Recreational Soccer).

The referee calmly explains that the mother must leave the field, and that no caution is warranted as no actions were observed that were reckless.  The mother persists in arguing for a caution.  The referee again asks the mother to leave the field.

The mother continues to yell at the official.  As the official is deciding to terminate the game, the husband of the mother runs on to the field, and grabs the referee by the throat.

The referee does not fight back.  Within seconds, bystanders on the sidelines pull the husband off the referee.

You Make the Call:

What in the heck do you do with THIS situation?

And yes, it really did happen.

Last Week’s Question – A Long Yarn

On a NFHS Junior Varsity match…

During the pre-game conference, the referees ask the coaches if their players are legally and properly equipped.  The coaches answer Yes.

During the game, the referee notices that several of the players from Team B are wearing friendship bracelets made of yard, that are taped down.

You Make the Call

What is the call?
What is the restart?

What You Said:

Referee 1:

Ahhh! The old hide the bracelet trick.

It depends on how you want to handle it.  If it is a first offense, the Caution goes to the coach (player comes off, can come back in at the next substitution opportunity).

You can card the second player, or send them both off and caution the coach (Spirit of the game?). 

Referee 2:

Bracelets are illegal equipment, even when taped down.

Find a convenient spot to stop the game (GK, TI, etc.), caution the coach, and have the players leave the field to correct their equipment.

For any subsequent illegal equipment violations, the card goes to the player.

Referee 3:

Friendship bracelets or anything else worn on the wrists must be removed and NOT taped over. I would never stop play because of this but deal with it at the first stoppage opportunity. Restart would be for whatever the stoppage was for.

The Answer: 

This one is straightforward.  Since this is an IHSA / NFHS game, the Rules in this case are clear:

Rule 4 – Player Equipment

Section 2 – Other Equipment

Article 1 – Illegal equipment shall not be worn by any player.  This applies to any equipment which, in the opinion of the referee, is dangerous or confusing.  Types of equipment which are illegal include, but are not limited to, the following:

Article 4 – Jewelry shall not be worn except for religious or medical medals.

a. A religious medal must be taped and worn under the uniform.

b. A medical alert must be taped and may be visible.

To clarify this, Play Ruling 4.2.4, Situation B is present:

Player A is discovered on the field wearing a yarn bracelet.  RULING: This item is adornment and is considered jewelry, and is therefore illegal.

Covering it doesn’t change the nature of the issue.

So, we have an Illegally Equipped Player.  Now what?  This is covered in Rule 4, Section 3, Coaches’ Responsibility.

The head coach shall receive the first caution issued (Yellow Card) for an illegally equipped player.  All subsequent cautions (Yellow Cards) for illegally equipped player(s) shall be issued directly to the player(s) and not to the head coach.

An illegally equipped player shall be instructed to leave the field of play when the ball next ceases to be in play.  Play shall not be stopped for an infringement of this rule except where the referee may stop play immediately where there is a dangerous situation.

The player(s) must be removed and may be replaced at the time of the Caution to the coach or player(s).

The removed player(s) may re-enter at the next legal substitution opportunity only after reporting to an official who shall be satisfied the player’s equipment and uniform are in order.

How about USSF?

Law 4 – The Players’ Equipment

Safety – A player must not use equipment or wear anything which is dangerous to himself or another player (including any kind of jewelry).

Infringements / Sanctions:

In the event of any infringement of this Law:

  • Play need not be stopped.
  • The player at fault is instructed by the referee to leave the field of play to correct his equipment.
  • The player leaves the field of play when the ball next ceases to be in play, unless he has already corrected his equipment.
  • Any player required to leave the field of play to correct his equipment must not re-enter without the referee’s permission.
  • The referee checks that the player’s equipment is correct before allowing him to re-enter the field of play.
  • The player is only allowed to re-enter the field of play when the ball is out of play.

A player who has been required to leave the field of play because of an infringement of this Law and who re-enters the field of play without the referee’s permission must be cautioned.

So, what’s the big deal?  One word: Snags.  If another player happens to snag a finger on the yarn bracelet, they can do everything from damage a tendon to breaking a finger in extreme cases.

The Rules / Laws of the Game are there to protect everyone.  It’s our job to enforce them as written.

So, the right restart is:

Allow play to continue until a dead ball unless a situation that is dangerous exists, and in such cases, immediately stop play.

When play stops, the player with the illegal equipment must leave the field and may be substituted for.   Apply the first Caution to the Coach in IHSA, ensuing cautions to the players.  No cautions for USSF please.

The player who leaves to correct his / her equipment needs to check in with an official before coming back on the field, at the next substitution opportunity.

This is a free service.  No advertising is solicited; no “donations” are requested.